<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why We Need To Nationalize Oil and Gas (Editorial, January/February 2006)</title>
	<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:42:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Seth</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-351425</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 17:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-351425</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hey folks, I don't beleive that this "project" would be impossible. Difficult? very. But nevertheless, it has been proven that nationalising private industries has work and work to be very helpfull to Canadians ( Quebecois ). Im talking about Hydro-Quebec. I now live in Calgary and I am stunned at the heating bills compared to the hydro-powered electricity in Montreal. But then again, Hydro-electricity is a renewable ressource, and does not need as much exploration as oil would.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Theres also the ishue of getting the private industries out of alberta, and soon newfoundland. My answer to that is do the same that quebec did with hydro-Quebec. Tax them so much that they no longer have a choice but to accepte the price that we would offer for their raffineries.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I beleive that this is essential to reduce gaz prices in Canada... aswell as heating bills. It will create more Canadian jobs avaible, and will garanty a stable price and economie.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I have more to say but I want to see how you disagree.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is OUR ressource, and should be controled and should be able to benefit ALL Canadians.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey folks, I don&#8217;t beleive that this &#8220;project&#8221; would be impossible. Difficult? very. But nevertheless, it has been proven that nationalising private industries has work and work to be very helpfull to Canadians ( Quebecois ). Im talking about Hydro-Quebec. I now live in Calgary and I am stunned at the heating bills compared to the hydro-powered electricity in Montreal. But then again, Hydro-electricity is a renewable ressource, and does not need as much exploration as oil would.</p>
<p>Theres also the ishue of getting the private industries out of alberta, and soon newfoundland. My answer to that is do the same that quebec did with hydro-Quebec. Tax them so much that they no longer have a choice but to accepte the price that we would offer for their raffineries.</p>
<p>I beleive that this is essential to reduce gaz prices in Canada&#8230; aswell as heating bills. It will create more Canadian jobs avaible, and will garanty a stable price and economie.</p>
<p>I have more to say but I want to see how you disagree.</p>
<p>This is OUR ressource, and should be controled and should be able to benefit ALL Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-299077</link>
		<dc:creator>S Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 11:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-299077</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;With great sorrow I write that Canada will never nationalize our oil industry.Oil’s mega corps are too big and they grease too many political palms so that they can stay in business.The cash cow is much to sweet to fuss with. Same reason why there will never be effective insurance or banking reform in this country. But I digress. Mostly I believe there is a prevailing backroom whispered fear that if Canada moves to control any of her precious natural resources our “cousins” to the south will move to protect the “US national intrest” and would seek to readjust our atitude with all the finesse of what they did in Iran. I say vote me King and I’ll change things&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With great sorrow I write that Canada will never nationalize our oil industry.Oil’s mega corps are too big and they grease too many political palms so that they can stay in business.The cash cow is much to sweet to fuss with. Same reason why there will never be effective insurance or banking reform in this country. But I digress. Mostly I believe there is a prevailing backroom whispered fear that if Canada moves to control any of her precious natural resources our “cousins” to the south will move to protect the “US national intrest” and would seek to readjust our atitude with all the finesse of what they did in Iran. I say vote me King and I’ll change things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-298452</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-298452</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;"There is not one nationalized industry/country in the world more productive than a privatized counterpart."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Drlabon: The point of private industry is to be productive, which means creating profits.  Profit is essentially a surplus, which goes to just a few, therefore for most Canadians, corporate profit is waste.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The point of nationalizing oil industries is not to make profit, rather to provide good jobs, and keep Canadian oil for Canadians.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is not one nationalized industry/country in the world more productive than a privatized counterpart.&#8221;</p>
<p>Drlabon: The point of private industry is to be productive, which means creating profits.  Profit is essentially a surplus, which goes to just a few, therefore for most Canadians, corporate profit is waste.</p>
<p>The point of nationalizing oil industries is not to make profit, rather to provide good jobs, and keep Canadian oil for Canadians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: drlabon</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-275019</link>
		<dc:creator>drlabon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 20:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-275019</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;If you throw out history, economics, and all logical reasoning, your suggestion would make sense.  However, since all of the above factors apply to the real world you're idea won't work.  Since I have a physics and M.B.A degree let me educate you.  When you steal/nationalize an industry all you will do is cause production to go down because there is no incentive for success.  There is not one nationalized industry/country in the world more productive than a privatized counterpart.  If you want better energy than you should provide tax breaks/incentives for companies to invest in.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you throw out history, economics, and all logical reasoning, your suggestion would make sense.  However, since all of the above factors apply to the real world you&#8217;re idea won&#8217;t work.  Since I have a physics and M.B.A degree let me educate you.  When you steal/nationalize an industry all you will do is cause production to go down because there is no incentive for success.  There is not one nationalized industry/country in the world more productive than a privatized counterpart.  If you want better energy than you should provide tax breaks/incentives for companies to invest in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: laughlin</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-244673</link>
		<dc:creator>laughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 23:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-244673</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The oil industry needs to be nationalized.  It is time for a political party to step up and do the right thing.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The oil industry needs to be nationalized.  It is time for a political party to step up and do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viamund</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-238903</link>
		<dc:creator>Viamund</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 03:57:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-238903</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It is true that all natural resources within Canada must be Nationalized. These are not the property of any one individual or other entity but are the property of the Nation. There must be no privatization of any kind permitted of any Natural Resources within Canada.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is true that all natural resources within Canada must be Nationalized. These are not the property of any one individual or other entity but are the property of the Nation. There must be no privatization of any kind permitted of any Natural Resources within Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-9143</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 09:37:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-9143</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This article speaks to me as well. However I must state my disagreement on one part of the article...&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;"exchanging long-term government bonds equivalent in value to the worth of the industry."&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The oil industry was built on the backs of wage workers (my father being one of them) How can we honestly justify paying this value to share holders who've enriched themselves from the sweat of the work force? Not to mention this enormous drain of public funds that could go towards the stated objectives.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;lslelel: I do agree, it's a great myth indeed. Consider the public health care system in which Harvard has done a studay that shows as a whole, Canadians spend less than half towards health services compared to the American for profit system (this is really incredible)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I say nationalize the oil industry, have the workers and general public elect a "public" board of directors with a mandate given to them by the people of Canada. No compenstion to the rich, only to those in genuine need.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article speaks to me as well. However I must state my disagreement on one part of the article&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;exchanging long-term government bonds equivalent in value to the worth of the industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>The oil industry was built on the backs of wage workers (my father being one of them) How can we honestly justify paying this value to share holders who&#8217;ve enriched themselves from the sweat of the work force? Not to mention this enormous drain of public funds that could go towards the stated objectives.</p>
<p>lslelel: I do agree, it&#8217;s a great myth indeed. Consider the public health care system in which Harvard has done a studay that shows as a whole, Canadians spend less than half towards health services compared to the American for profit system (this is really incredible)</p>
<p>I say nationalize the oil industry, have the workers and general public elect a &#8220;public&#8221; board of directors with a mandate given to them by the people of Canada. No compenstion to the rich, only to those in genuine need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lslelel</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-656</link>
		<dc:creator>lslelel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 19:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-656</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;This is a brilliant idea that needs to really enter the national discourse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The oil sands is a national treasure that will provide for many Canadians far into the future, and will give Canadians control over their own countries most valuable resource. It does not belong to corrupt transnationals.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The arguments about wasteful bureaucracy is a powerful myth that must be ignored. There is not another more inefficient industry than oil and energy. Yet they reap disgusting fortunes, and manipulate markets worse than any publicly transparent government organization could.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a brilliant idea that needs to really enter the national discourse.</p>
<p>The oil sands is a national treasure that will provide for many Canadians far into the future, and will give Canadians control over their own countries most valuable resource. It does not belong to corrupt transnationals.</p>
<p>The arguments about wasteful bureaucracy is a powerful myth that must be ignored. There is not another more inefficient industry than oil and energy. Yet they reap disgusting fortunes, and manipulate markets worse than any publicly transparent government organization could.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sma lik</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>sma lik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2006 21:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-637</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The cost of purchasing these companies, combined with the diversion of profits suggested would exponentially increase our nations debt, force a raising of interest rates and devaluation of our currency.  All of which would harm the poorest and middle class more than the wealthy and increase our already high dependance on exports to the U.S.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The suggestion above would:  not meet the objectives (decreased consumption); create a new massive government beurocracy; and increase our dependance on the United States.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I agree, as most reasonable people do, that our planets energy consumption is unsustainable and is causing terrific harm to our shared environment.  I suggest heavy government investment in far-sighted infrastructure, tax breaks and direct investment into entrepeneurial initiatives to create alternative sources of power, including increased reliance on nuclear power.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cost of purchasing these companies, combined with the diversion of profits suggested would exponentially increase our nations debt, force a raising of interest rates and devaluation of our currency.  All of which would harm the poorest and middle class more than the wealthy and increase our already high dependance on exports to the U.S.</p>
<p>The suggestion above would:  not meet the objectives (decreased consumption); create a new massive government beurocracy; and increase our dependance on the United States.</p>
<p>I agree, as most reasonable people do, that our planets energy consumption is unsustainable and is causing terrific harm to our shared environment.  I suggest heavy government investment in far-sighted infrastructure, tax breaks and direct investment into entrepeneurial initiatives to create alternative sources of power, including increased reliance on nuclear power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: william clegg</title>
		<link>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-496</link>
		<dc:creator>william clegg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 23:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://canadiandimension.com/articles/2006/01/01/278/#comment-496</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I concur with this analysis.  Ultimately the resources of a nation should belong to that nation, meaning the citizens of that nation, not any particular individual or corportation.  And the citizens of that nation should have first dibs on the resource at affordable prices since it is theirs in the first place.  The fact that Canada has handed over so much of its natural resources to private interests is next to treasonous in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We should all take a long hard look at how Venezula has ensured that it's own people - as well as many of its neighbours - are assured access to affordable oil despite the OPEC combine's gouging.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, another way to make the exploiter of a national resource pay through the nose is to tax the ass off of them or simply raise the cost of access to the resource accordingly.  And that 'payment' could take the form of provding us, the supplier of the resource, with below market products.  In essence a kickback, a practice that has long been accepted within the corporate and business communities.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We forget that corporations and businesses that profess the 'bottom line' are not that much different from the street corner junkie.  They need their fix [in this case a resource they can profit from] and they will do anything, including sell their executives into slavery, to get their fix.  Of course they will whine, pout and scream about the injustice.  But, ultimately, their addiction to their own bottom line will win out in the end and they will pay whatever the toll may be.  And, if they decide to go elsewhere for the resource, that simply leaves the door open to the long iine of replacement interests we know who are waiting their turn at the 'wheel of fortune'.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur with this analysis.  Ultimately the resources of a nation should belong to that nation, meaning the citizens of that nation, not any particular individual or corportation.  And the citizens of that nation should have first dibs on the resource at affordable prices since it is theirs in the first place.  The fact that Canada has handed over so much of its natural resources to private interests is next to treasonous in my opinion.</p>
<p>We should all take a long hard look at how Venezula has ensured that it&#8217;s own people - as well as many of its neighbours - are assured access to affordable oil despite the OPEC combine&#8217;s gouging.</p>
<p>However, another way to make the exploiter of a national resource pay through the nose is to tax the ass off of them or simply raise the cost of access to the resource accordingly.  And that &#8216;payment&#8217; could take the form of provding us, the supplier of the resource, with below market products.  In essence a kickback, a practice that has long been accepted within the corporate and business communities.</p>
<p>We forget that corporations and businesses that profess the &#8216;bottom line&#8217; are not that much different from the street corner junkie.  They need their fix [in this case a resource they can profit from] and they will do anything, including sell their executives into slavery, to get their fix.  Of course they will whine, pout and scream about the injustice.  But, ultimately, their addiction to their own bottom line will win out in the end and they will pay whatever the toll may be.  And, if they decide to go elsewhere for the resource, that simply leaves the door open to the long iine of replacement interests we know who are waiting their turn at the &#8216;wheel of fortune&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
